A pivotal campus police interview, which local prosecutors claim they never received in its entirety before initially declining to press charges in the Cornell University alleged rape case, is now poised for intense scrutiny under the review led by former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates. Yates, appointed by Cornell’s trustees, will independently examine the university’s handling of the October 2024 allegations involving members of the Chi Phi fraternity, following Cornell’s own investigation that resulted in expulsions and suspensions. The accuser, identified as Jane Doe, stated with “100% confidence I was raped” during a November 2024 interview, further describing later sexual activity as coercive and her state as “completely and totally incapacitated.” This contrasts sharply with a six-page sworn statement reviewed by Tompkins County District Attorney Matthew Van Houten, which described Doe’s participation as voluntary and consensual, information he stated “changes the landscape” now that he acknowledges his office did not initially receive the full interview. Attorneys suggest that such full interviews often contain critical details that can alter the course of a case, emphasizing that law enforcement is expected to include all salient facts in sworn statements. Cornell maintains its police department provided Doe’s sworn statement and a Snapchat screenshot in 2024 as standard protocol, but the omission of the complete interview remains a central point of inquiry as Yates’ team, granted access to all relevant records and personnel, assesses the university’s response and procedures, with potential findings that could be shared with the New York Attorney General’s office, which is conducting a separate criminal investigation.
Adapted from: Latest & Breaking News on Fox News
