Site icon USA Daily Wire

Trump Cites New Witness Account in Escalating Reflecting Pool Vandalism Claims

President Donald Trump has intensified his allegations regarding the dismissed Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool vandalism case, now highlighting a National Park Service employee’s sworn statement claiming former Olympian David Hearn “violently” ripped and tugged at the pool’s coating before authorities arrived. Trump shared excerpts from court documents on Truth Social, featuring an interview with a National Park Service employee (W-1) who witnessed Hearn approach the pool while NPS staff were cleaning it. According to W-1, Hearn initially appeared to be taking photos or videos of existing damage with his cellphone before kneeling and “violently” pulling at the pool’s blue coating. The employee alerted a colleague to contact the police and told Hearn to stop, to which Hearn allegedly responded that NPS personnel were “awfully sensitive about the pool.” Hearn reportedly continued his actions until National Guard soldiers intervened. Trump pointed to this witness account as crucial evidence, arguing it supports his assertion that at least some of the damage was deliberate, despite federal prosecutors having moved to dismiss the felony charge against Hearn. He also alluded to other alleged incidents, including the use of an “acid like material” on newly installed grass and the inscription “86 47,” suggesting significant damage beyond contractor error, though acknowledging some issues stemmed from rushed renovations ahead of July 4th. This renewed focus follows Trump’s public disagreement with U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s decision to drop the charges, which prosecutors attributed to newly disclosed documents revealing problems with the pool coating’s installation by the contractor, Atlantic Industrial Coatings, and the project’s expedited timeline. Prosecutors stated that had this information been available earlier, they would not have sought the indictment, and the new evidence made it difficult to prove Hearn’s sole responsibility beyond a reasonable doubt.

Adapted from: Latest Political News on Fox News

Exit mobile version